<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bloggers as Video Ads Endorsers – Commensal and “60 blogueurs Québécois en 60 secondes”</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jfbelisle.com/2009/11/bloggers-as-video-ads-endorsers-commensal-and-60-blogueurs-quebecois-en-60-secondes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jfbelisle.com/2009/11/bloggers-as-video-ads-endorsers-commensal-and-60-blogueurs-quebecois-en-60-secondes/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=bloggers-as-video-ads-endorsers-commensal-and-60-blogueurs-quebecois-en-60-secondes</link>
	<description>Marketing, Analytics and Entertainment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:18:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Di Gaspero</title>
		<link>http://jfbelisle.com/2009/11/bloggers-as-video-ads-endorsers-commensal-and-60-blogueurs-quebecois-en-60-secondes/#comment-671</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Di Gaspero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jfbelisle.com/?p=1013#comment-671</guid>
		<description>Hey Jean François,

First, I believe that the concept shown in the ad is original and creative, but also effective: Like you said in your previous comment, having 60 people gathered toward a single cause and doing the same thing in the ad certainly attracts people&#039;s attention.

However, i still believe that the strategy chosen by Commensal to spread the word could have been done more efficiently...Why?
In this particular ad, I believe that bloggers are not good endorsers based on their lack of credibility (Q2 of your post). Like you said, I will trust you if you talk about e-marketing and technology, but i won&#039;t trust your opinion as regards climate issues. So even if i watch the video on your blog, i won&#039;t post it on my blog, my twitter or my facebook, simply because i did not like it enough to represent it thoughout all the social media where i am present...so Viral Marketing stops here.
Moreover, I believe that a better title  could have been chosen for the video: Is it really useful to explain in the title that the video is illustrating &quot;60 bloggeurs québécois&quot;?

My recommendations: 
1)Commensal could have used people with more &quot;expert power&quot;, that is, people who know more about the climate issues and that would have been more credible...Why not using bloggers who post articles related to the environment, sustainable development. 
2) But doing so would not be enough (actually, just doing so would change nothing). To be fully effective, i believe that the video should have shown the URL address of the company with a sentence such as &quot;Pour en savoir plus, rendez-vous sur www...&quot;. Then, for those who would actually go on Commensal&#039;s website, it should have a special section/page explaining the concept of the video, showing the names of the bloggers who participated to the video as well as links reffering to their blogs (just like you did on this post!), where all the bloggers would then put more detailled information on how to act to solve climate issues. 
3) I believe the video would have reached more people if it had been done in English instead of French...First, simply because english is spoken by almost everyone in Canada and even in the rest of the world, which is definitely not the case of French. Second, because like you said, Quebec is way ahead compared to the rest of Canada in terms of educating people to the climate cause...So i believe that Quebecers did not need this video as much as Canadians from other provinces.

Marc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jean François,</p>
<p>First, I believe that the concept shown in the ad is original and creative, but also effective: Like you said in your previous comment, having 60 people gathered toward a single cause and doing the same thing in the ad certainly attracts people&#8217;s attention.</p>
<p>However, i still believe that the strategy chosen by Commensal to spread the word could have been done more efficiently&#8230;Why?<br />
In this particular ad, I believe that bloggers are not good endorsers based on their lack of credibility (Q2 of your post). Like you said, I will trust you if you talk about e-marketing and technology, but i won&#8217;t trust your opinion as regards climate issues. So even if i watch the video on your blog, i won&#8217;t post it on my blog, my twitter or my facebook, simply because i did not like it enough to represent it thoughout all the social media where i am present&#8230;so Viral Marketing stops here.<br />
Moreover, I believe that a better title  could have been chosen for the video: Is it really useful to explain in the title that the video is illustrating &#8220;60 bloggeurs québécois&#8221;?</p>
<p>My recommendations:<br />
1)Commensal could have used people with more &#8220;expert power&#8221;, that is, people who know more about the climate issues and that would have been more credible&#8230;Why not using bloggers who post articles related to the environment, sustainable development.<br />
2) But doing so would not be enough (actually, just doing so would change nothing). To be fully effective, i believe that the video should have shown the URL address of the company with a sentence such as &#8220;Pour en savoir plus, rendez-vous sur <a href="http://www.." rel="nofollow">http://www..</a>.&#8221;. Then, for those who would actually go on Commensal&#8217;s website, it should have a special section/page explaining the concept of the video, showing the names of the bloggers who participated to the video as well as links reffering to their blogs (just like you did on this post!), where all the bloggers would then put more detailled information on how to act to solve climate issues.<br />
3) I believe the video would have reached more people if it had been done in English instead of French&#8230;First, simply because english is spoken by almost everyone in Canada and even in the rest of the world, which is definitely not the case of French. Second, because like you said, Quebec is way ahead compared to the rest of Canada in terms of educating people to the climate cause&#8230;So i believe that Quebecers did not need this video as much as Canadians from other provinces.</p>
<p>Marc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean-Francois Belisle</title>
		<link>http://jfbelisle.com/2009/11/bloggers-as-video-ads-endorsers-commensal-and-60-blogueurs-quebecois-en-60-secondes/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean-Francois Belisle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jfbelisle.com/?p=1013#comment-229</guid>
		<description>Thanks Eve for your comment. You raised interesting points that could generate more discussion.

1. To your first question, I would tend to think that this kind of ad is beneficial for both parties. Like you mention, it is an ad for the cause and it is also an ad for the bloggers. However, when Kate Winslet appears in an ad for l&#039;Oréal, we can say that it is an ad for Kate Winslet, as well as an ad for l&#039;Oréal. In this way, they both get some benefits out of it, unless the fit is really bad between the advertisers and the endorser.

2. Your second question is interesting. I personally agree that most viewers don&#039;t really know who these bloggers are, and I think the impact is more at the aggregate-level than at the individual-level. In this way, it is more about the reunion of these bloggers than about these bloggers individually. However, concerning the impact of bloggers on this cause, I am pretty sure it is minimal, since Quebec is way ahead compared to the rest of Canada in terms of educating people to the climate cause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Eve for your comment. You raised interesting points that could generate more discussion.</p>
<p>1. To your first question, I would tend to think that this kind of ad is beneficial for both parties. Like you mention, it is an ad for the cause and it is also an ad for the bloggers. However, when Kate Winslet appears in an ad for l&#8217;Oréal, we can say that it is an ad for Kate Winslet, as well as an ad for l&#8217;Oréal. In this way, they both get some benefits out of it, unless the fit is really bad between the advertisers and the endorser.</p>
<p>2. Your second question is interesting. I personally agree that most viewers don&#8217;t really know who these bloggers are, and I think the impact is more at the aggregate-level than at the individual-level. In this way, it is more about the reunion of these bloggers than about these bloggers individually. However, concerning the impact of bloggers on this cause, I am pretty sure it is minimal, since Quebec is way ahead compared to the rest of Canada in terms of educating people to the climate cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eve Saal</title>
		<link>http://jfbelisle.com/2009/11/bloggers-as-video-ads-endorsers-commensal-and-60-blogueurs-quebecois-en-60-secondes/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>Eve Saal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jfbelisle.com/?p=1013#comment-228</guid>
		<description>Hey,

On one hand, I have to admit that it&#039;s an interesting way to fight for a good cause. 
On the other hand, few questions pop into my head (that are linked with your questions) :
 - isn&#039;t it a good ad for those bloggers more than for &quot;the planet&quot; ? (the other blogs&#039; readers will probably want to check out blogs they didn&#039;t know about before) 
 - as we cannot really recognize those bloggers, will they really have an influence on people in a video ? As you said they might blog about it but beside their blog, their faces are not well known.

It is just questions I ask. And, I don&#039;t alter the fact that bloggers are fighting for an important cause with this video.

Eve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey,</p>
<p>On one hand, I have to admit that it&#8217;s an interesting way to fight for a good cause.<br />
On the other hand, few questions pop into my head (that are linked with your questions) :<br />
 &#8211; isn&#8217;t it a good ad for those bloggers more than for &#8220;the planet&#8221; ? (the other blogs&#8217; readers will probably want to check out blogs they didn&#8217;t know about before)<br />
 &#8211; as we cannot really recognize those bloggers, will they really have an influence on people in a video ? As you said they might blog about it but beside their blog, their faces are not well known.</p>
<p>It is just questions I ask. And, I don&#8217;t alter the fact that bloggers are fighting for an important cause with this video.</p>
<p>Eve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean-Francois Belisle</title>
		<link>http://jfbelisle.com/2009/11/bloggers-as-video-ads-endorsers-commensal-and-60-blogueurs-quebecois-en-60-secondes/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean-Francois Belisle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 18:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jfbelisle.com/?p=1013#comment-219</guid>
		<description>Hey hey thanks Bob for the comment and thanks for the blue striped sweater comment. I totally agree that the &quot;media fragmentation&quot; concept is so important and is further exaggerated with blogs. However, I would tend to think that if a blogger advertise a product that isn&#039;t aligned with his/her expertise, even though readers may generally share the blogger&#039;s point of view due to media fragmentation, then propagation will tend to be lower compared to a situation where the product is aligned with the expertise, this is generally referred to as the &quot;match-up hypothesis&quot; in ad endorsement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey hey thanks Bob for the comment and thanks for the blue striped sweater comment. I totally agree that the &#8220;media fragmentation&#8221; concept is so important and is further exaggerated with blogs. However, I would tend to think that if a blogger advertise a product that isn&#8217;t aligned with his/her expertise, even though readers may generally share the blogger&#8217;s point of view due to media fragmentation, then propagation will tend to be lower compared to a situation where the product is aligned with the expertise, this is generally referred to as the &#8220;match-up hypothesis&#8221; in ad endorsement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://jfbelisle.com/2009/11/bloggers-as-video-ads-endorsers-commensal-and-60-blogueurs-quebecois-en-60-secondes/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jfbelisle.com/?p=1013#comment-218</guid>
		<description>Re: Effectiveness. My view is this:  Media fragmentation means that I can seek out news and commentary that reinforce my beliefs.  If I have conservative views, I subscribe to and watch FOX. If I have liberal views I tune in to CBS or ABC.  This is further exaggerated with blogs.  If I am a big environmentalist, I will seek out blogs to support and further my pre-existing views.  In this sense, the blogging is &quot;preaching to the converted.&quot;  On the plus side, this reinforcement may spur the converted into action.  On the down side, there is the potential for increasing radicalization of views.

Re: Attractiveness.  Ashton Kutcher, Melanie Griffith, and a bunch of models have blogs.  Plus you look great in that blue striped sweater. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Effectiveness. My view is this:  Media fragmentation means that I can seek out news and commentary that reinforce my beliefs.  If I have conservative views, I subscribe to and watch FOX. If I have liberal views I tune in to CBS or ABC.  This is further exaggerated with blogs.  If I am a big environmentalist, I will seek out blogs to support and further my pre-existing views.  In this sense, the blogging is &#8220;preaching to the converted.&#8221;  On the plus side, this reinforcement may spur the converted into action.  On the down side, there is the potential for increasing radicalization of views.</p>
<p>Re: Attractiveness.  Ashton Kutcher, Melanie Griffith, and a bunch of models have blogs.  Plus you look great in that blue striped sweater. <img src='http://jfbelisle.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

